Written by Bertrand Théaud, Statrys Founder
20+ years in Asia as a corporate lawyer, investor, and fintech founder. I've sat on both sides of the table and seen the same avoidable mistakes hit founders again and again. The reviews and articles I write are for founders who'd rather skip the mistakes.
Key Takeaways
30/70 remains the default first-order deposit split with Chinese suppliers in 2026, essentially unchanged from prior years. The ratio was never the risky part of this arrangement.
What actually determines whether you keep leverage is when the 70% releases, against a bill of lading copy or a passed pre-shipment inspection, not blind pre-payment before goods are ready.
US tariff exposure has become more volatile in 2026, which means a shipment's landed cost can shift meaningfully between order confirmation and delivery, raising the real cost of releasing a large balance without conditions attached.
Orders above roughly USD 50,000 to USD 100,000, or categories needing stability testing, are where 30/70 typically stops being the right structure altogether.
Is 30/70 still standard? Wrong question. Every current, buyer-side source on this says yes, it's still the default first-order split most Chinese factories quote, more or less unchanged from two years ago. If that's the question you're asking your supplier, you already have the answer.
The question worth actually asking is different: have you set the conditions on that split correctly? Because that's where these deals go wrong, not in the 30/70 ratio itself. A buyer who wires 30% on order confirmation and then wires the remaining 70% the moment the supplier says the goods are "ready" has given up every bit of leverage they had, regardless of what ratio they started with.
Get the release conditions wrong and the ratio stops mattering: you can lose just as much on a cautious 20/80 split as an aggressive 50/50 one if the balance goes out before you've actually confirmed what you're paying for.
This article covers what's actually stable about the 30/70 split, what's genuinely different about paying it in 2026, and what conditions determine whether it protects you or just feels like it does.
The Short Answer: Yes, With Conditions
Across multiple independent, recently updated sources covering China sourcing in 2026, 30/70 (30% deposit on order confirmation, 70% before shipment) remains the default T/T payment structure quoted by most Chinese factories, particularly for first orders under roughly USD 50,000. Nothing about that headline number has shifted.
What separates a 30/70 split that protects you from one that doesn't isn't the ratio. It's three conditions that either are or aren't written into your purchase order:
- What the 70% is paid against: a bill of lading copy or inspection sign-off, not a verbal "it's ready."
- Whether a third-party inspection is a condition of releasing it: written into the PO, not agreed to informally over chat.
- What happens to the 30% if the order falls through: before production starts versus after materials are committed.
Get any one of these three wrong and the ratio stops protecting you, no matter how conservative it looks on paper.
Why the Ratio Isn't the Part That's Changed
The 30% deposit exists to fund the supplier's raw materials and get the production line started. Most factories won't begin cutting, tooling, or material procurement until the deposit clears, and the 30% figure is roughly calibrated to cover bill-of-materials cost for a single run plus any one-time jig or print costs. That math hasn't changed: raw material and setup costs for a given order are still roughly the same share of total order value they were in past years, so there's no structural reason for the deposit percentage itself to have moved.
What has stayed constant is also who the 30/70 split favours at each end: the supplier gets working capital before committing factory time, and the buyer keeps most of their money until they have something to show for it. That balance of incentives is still intact in 2026, which is exactly why the ratio hasn't needed to move.
The Part That Actually Matters: When the 70% Releases
The 30% deposit is usually non-refundable once cutting or material procurement starts, so treat it as a sunk cost the moment you wire it, not as a hostage you can pull back. Cancellation windows narrow fast, often to 48 hours before material release.
The 70% balance is where the real protection lives, or doesn't. Standard, defensible practice is to remit the 70% against pre-shipment documents (a bill of lading copy, or a supplier's notice that goods are inspected, packed, and ready to load), not after delivery and not on a verbal "it's done." This is the leverage moment: hold the balance until your pre-shipment inspection clears, and write that condition into the purchase order itself, not into a side email that's easy to forget once the wire is sent.
A pre-shipment inspection (PSI) should be a written condition of releasing the 70%, not an optional extra. Third-party inspection bodies such as SGS, Bureau Veritas, Intertek, or QIMA typically charge in the range of USD 200 to USD 500 per man-day depending on the inspector and scope, and a standard consumer-goods inspection takes about one man-day. Schedule it once the factory reports production 80 to 100% complete and fully packed. Defects found at PSI need to be fixed before the 70% goes out; once the balance is paid and cargo leaves the port, recourse drops sharply.
When 30/70 Isn't the Right Structure Anymore
30/70 is built for a specific situation: a first or early order, under roughly USD50,000 to USD 100,000, for a product that doesn't need extended stability or safety testing before it's sellable. Outside that situation, it starts to make less sense.
For larger first orders, above roughly USD 50,000 to USD100,000, a letter of credit shifts payment risk from the buyer directly onto the issuing bank, which is closer to the standard for OEM manufacturing at that scale. Statrys' comparison of wire transfer, escrow, and letter of credit covers the cost and mechanics of each option, and when the extra setup of an L/C is worth it relative to a straightforward T/T split.
For product categories with long stability or safety testing cycles, cosmetics OEM is the clearest example: a straight 30/70 split can leave a large balance exposed for the entire testing window. Milestone-based payments (for example 30% on order confirmation, 30% after a production or sample milestone, 40% before shipment) spread that exposure across verifiable checkpoints instead of concentrating it into two payments.
| Structure | Best For | How It Protects You |
|---|---|---|
| 30/70 T/T | First orders under ~USD 50K, straightforward products | Balance held until pre-shipment inspection clears |
| Letter of Credit | Larger first orders (~USD 50K-USD 100K+), OEM manufacturing | Bank, not you, carries the payment risk |
| Milestone-based (e.g. 30/30/40) | Long testing cycles: cosmetics, electronics with certification | Exposure spread across verifiable checkpoints instead of one large balance |
What's Actually Shifted in 2026: Landed Cost Volatility, Not the Split
Here's the genuine 2026 change, and it isn't the deposit ratio. US tariff exposure on Chinese goods has moved twice in 2026 alone: the Supreme Court struck down the IEEPA tariffs in February, a temporary 10% global tariff (Section 122) replaced them days later that same month, and that tariff itself expired in July, replaced by a new Section 301 tariff tied to forced-labour import enforcement that adds 12.5% for Chinese-origin goods on top of the pre-existing Section 301 rates. Statrys' guide to importing from China covers the current mechanics and rates in full.
What that means for a 30/70 split specifically: the landed cost of a shipment can now shift meaningfully in the weeks between order confirmation and delivery, in a way it genuinely could not a year ago. If your end market is the US, a shipment that pencilled out at a given margin when you wired the 30% deposit could look different by the time the 70% balance is due. That doesn't change what percentage you should deposit. It raises the cost of releasing a large, unconditional balance without first re-checking your landed cost math, and it's one more reason to hold the 70% against pre-shipment documents rather than paying blind on a timeline set weeks earlier.
This is also why the timing lever from our breakdown of negotiation levers that actually move price (ordering ahead of a factory's slow season) interacts with payment terms more than it used to: a longer gap between deposit and balance is now also a longer window of tariff exposure, not just a longer window of currency exposure.
How the Split Changes as the Relationship Matures
30/70 is generally a starting point, not a permanent arrangement. As a buyer completes several orders with the same supplier and demonstrates reliable payment behaviour, terms typically loosen: a smaller deposit percentage, payment against invoice rather than upfront, or a shift toward net terms for the balance. There's no fixed timeline for this. One commonly cited pattern is meaningful improvement after two to three successful orders, but treat that as a general direction rather than a guarantee any specific supplier will follow it.
The practical implication: don't assume the terms on your first order are the terms you're stuck with indefinitely. If a supplier relationship is going well, it's reasonable to propose renegotiating the split directly, tied to your actual order history rather than a general request for "better terms."
Paying the Deposit Without Losing Your Leverage
None of the conditions above matter if you can't verify, in real time, that your deposit or balance has actually cleared. A supplier who claims a wire hasn't arrived when it has (or hasn't, when they claim it has) creates a common enough dispute that you want a clear, timestamped record on your side, not just their word.
Statrys clients paying Chinese suppliers use a multi-currency business account with real-time SWIFT payment tracking (MT-103) to confirm exactly when a staged payment clears on their end, so a 30/70 schedule comes with a verifiable record rather than a supplier's assurance that a payment "should be there soon."
If you'd rather not manage supplier vetting and payment-term negotiation directly, our breakdown of whether a China sourcing agent is worth the money covers what an agent's fee actually buys you, including on the payment-terms side.
Was this article helpful?
Yes
No
FAQs
Is 30/70 still standard in 2026?
Yiwu is famous for being the world's largest small commodities wholesale market, a single complex of more than 75,000 booths selling around 1.8 million kinds of products. It's also known as a major global source of Christmas decorations, with surrounding factories reportedly producing close to two-thirds of the world's supply.
What happens if a supplier asks for 50/50 or more?
It's not automatically a red flag. Higher deposits are common for larger first orders, highly customized products, non-standard tooling, or suppliers who've been burned by buyers walking away after production started. Ask what the higher deposit is covering before assuming it's unreasonable.
Should I release the 70% before or after inspection?
After, ideally, and write that condition into the purchase order rather than agreeing to it informally. Releasing the balance against a bill of lading copy or supplier notice, with a passed third-party pre-shipment inspection as a prerequisite, keeps your leverage intact until the goods are verified ready to ship.
Is a deposit refundable if I cancel the order?
Usually only the unspent portion. Once a supplier has committed the deposit to raw materials, cutting, or custom tooling, that portion becomes a sunk cost regardless of what the payment terms say about refundability in principle. Cancel windows are typically short, often within 48 hours of order confirmation.
Does a bigger deposit mean a better price?
Not reliably, and it shouldn't be treated as a negotiating lever on its own. A larger deposit changes the supplier's cash flow, which can sometimes be traded for a modest concession, but it primarily increases your exposure if something goes wrong mid-production.
